Page 6 - Anuario29

Abdón Sánchez Noguera. Las Medidas Cautelares en el Procedimiento
14 por Intimacion / Pp. 13-40

Abstract
This work contains some ideas about the precautionary measures in the
procedure by notice provided for in article 640 and following of the Code
of Civil Procedure venezuelan, understanding that the same are governed
by a special system that departs from the regulation of interim protection
general developed in the Third Book of the same code.
In this regard, considering the criteria that doctrine and jurisprudence on the
issue have been exposed since the promulgation of the adjective existing
code, there is the recognition of two modalities of the precautionary
measures in the procedure, based on the legal nature of the same and the
content of the article 646.
On the contrary of what until now has been considered, to understand that
the rules that govern the precautionary measures in the payment procedure
are exclusive of those that regulate the regular precautionary procedure,
the possibility arose of supplementarily apply these standards, as may be
necessary for the guarantee of due process and the needs of the procedure,
without ignoring the principle of procedural specialty laid down in article
22 of the Code of Civil Procedure.
Finally makes some conclusions to title of reflection on a future reform of
the Code of Civil Procedure, with regard to the precautionary measures in
the procedure by summons.
Summons. Legal nature. Precautionary Measures. Procedure. Challenge.

I. INTRODUCCION

Toda la construcción teórica de la tutela cautelar en el proceso
civil, se ha construido sobre la base de un hecho jurídico indiscutido: la
existencia del proceso.

A partir de ese hecho, o mejor, de uno de sus problemas y como
consecuencia del mismo, surge la necesidad de ofrecerle al justiciable la
garantía de que la sentencia a dictarse, tenga asegurada su efectiva ejecución
para la satisfacción del derecho reconocido (Derecho a la tutela judicial
efectiva, Art. 26 de la CRBV), ofreciéndole un patrimonio ejecutable o un
bien restituible en poder de quien resulte obligado por la decisión judicial.
Ese problema es la lenta tramitación de los asuntos judiciales o demora
injustificada, que trasladado a la tutela cautelar se traduce en el “periculum
in mora”, uno de los presupuestos de dicha tutela, que al producirse y no
prevenirse su efecto, violenta la garantía constitucional del “plazo razonable”
(Art. 49-3 de la CRBV); es por ello que siendo el proceso la garantía de